top button
Flag Notify
Site Registration

which 3GPP spec has message level details about Sp interface between PCRF and HSS/SPR ?

+5 votes

I have a requirement where I want to fetch User Subscriber Full details at PCRF. Can anyone please tell me about exact 3GPP specification number ?

posted Jul 12, 2013 by Vimal Kumar Mishra

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button
I guess there is no specific spec for Sp but you can refer to the one written for Sh interface

3 Answers

+1 vote

You should start with 3GPP TS 23.203

Have a look at section 5.2.3, if you are looking for a standardised interface I would consider Ud over Sp.

answer Jul 12, 2013 by anonymous
+1 vote

The specification giving information about User Subscriber Data stored in SPR for PCRF is the stage 2 3GPP TS 23.203 (e.g. cf 6.2.4 subclause).

There is no detailed description of such data transferred over the Sp interface as there is no stage 3 3GPP specification describing the Sp interface.

answer Jul 12, 2013 by anonymous
0 votes

I think its 23.203...

answer Jul 12, 2013 by Salil Agrawal
Similar Questions
0 votes

As per specification, PCRF has interface with SPR to get policy and charging rules for an user.
I want to know, whether implementation of this interface is operator dependent or not ? If answer is not then which specification contains the detail on Sp interface messages ?

+3 votes

Looking for the information related to PCRF.

Another specific question. When the PCRF decides on a QOS and sends across to P-GW. P-GW might not have got any info related to Dedicated bearer to be established earlier. So how does it map this newly sent QOS for the new dedicated bearer to the one it requested by P-CSCF.

I am trying to understand, how to map the QOS info sent by PCRF to the "dedicated bearer request by the P-CSCF. Can PCRF on sending the QOS, also create the new dedicated bearer id, which is sent back to P-CSCF ?

Any info regarding with is very helpful.

+3 votes

3GPP 29.210 section 6 talks about Gx over Gy application. My question is about the use case, i.e. in what practical scenario one will require to have Gx over Gy support.

+2 votes

As per my understanding both are same but could not confirm the same from internet so asking this question.