top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Facebook Login
      Site Registration Why to Join

Facebook Login
Site Registration

LTE: Why LTE can not support Soft Handover?

0 votes
212 views
LTE: Why LTE can not support Soft Handover?
posted Aug 28, 2014 by Mohammad Alsharif

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

1 Answer

0 votes

Possibly a duplicate of http://tech.queryhome.com/43851/why-soft-and-softer-handovers-are-not-possible-in-lte

Let me paste the answer here -

Since there is no longer a RNC in E-UTRAN, data streams from two active sets can't be combined unless ePC plays a part (or one eNB serves as SRNC), which is clearly undesirable. However, this topic worth to be looked into a little detail.

The root cause of having soft-handover in CDMA systems is that, in CDMA, each channel is an interference to other channels, therefore transmit power control is key to maximize system capacity. Especially at cell edge, a high transmission power could block other UEs from accessing the network. Here is where soft-handover can play its part. It allows transmission on different links therefore adds Rx diversity gain. During soft-handover, two NodeBs transmit/receive the same date stream on different physical channels. The data from different active set will be combined at UE (downlink) or at RNC (uplink). As such, the bit stream can be decoded much more reliably than if only one NodeB were transmitting/receiving. In other words, without soft-handover, to achieve the same SINR, higher power is required from a NodeB or from UE, which is undesirable.

In LTE, due to the orthogonal on both downlink and uplink within a cell, power control is not as important as in 3G. Therefore, soft-handover can be dropped from the system design without having much penalty to the system performance. This reduces network architecture complexity.

To support soft-handover, Iur is mandatory in case of different NodeBs involved in the soft handover are not controlled by the same RNC. In this case, the SRNC will be responsible to combine the data flow and DRNC only controls the NodeB involved in the soft-handover. The cost of having an Iur interface is significant especially if operators have multi-vendors RNC. 3GPP removed RNC node from E-UTRAN therefore simplified the architecture. There is however a X2 interface, which is similar to Iur but not the same. X2 can be used to forward packets in case of a handover simply for lossless mobility. But unlike an Iur interface, which have to support much more complex signalling, the X2 is a lot simpler.

answer Aug 28, 2014 by Salil Agrawal
Similar Questions
+2 votes

What is the reasoning behind to use different security keys after moving from one eNodeB to another eNodeB (Handover) ?

+4 votes

What is the use of TAI , which is included in handover required message ?

+1 vote

Please can any one say when vertical key derivation can happen

+1 vote

Unlike for A3 and A5 events, for A6 event frequency offset is not considered while evaluating entering and leaving condition. Can anyone please explain this particular case ?

+2 votes

How ever same ENB is handling source and target cell, then why do we need handover just RACH is enough to make synch ?

Contact Us
+91 9880187415
sales@queryhome.net
support@queryhome.net
#280, 3rd floor, 5th Main
6th Sector, HSR Layout
Bangalore-560102
Karnataka INDIA.
QUERY HOME
...