top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Facebook Login
      Site Registration Why to Join

Facebook Login
Site Registration

Which one to use syslog-ng or rsyslog on Linux

+1 vote
81 views

I've used syslog-ng for some time. I like it. I have a project in which I need to choose a central logging solution. What are your experiences with rsyslog? Is it more complex to setup than syslog-ng? Or maybe does it have some additional features?

I am also thinking about using some gui tools for log parsing and graphing. May be proprietary/paid. Any suggestions?

posted Nov 6, 2013 by Amit Parthsarthi

Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button Google+ Share Button LinkedIn Share Button Multiple Social Share Button

1 Answer

+1 vote

for GUI tools.
Paid: Splunk.
Unpaid: logstash/elasticsearch/kibana.

answer Nov 6, 2013 by Abhay Kulkarni
LogAnalyzer by the same people that do rsyslog
Similar Questions
+5 votes

I have an environment in which I would like to implement a GUI for parsing syslog-ng logs from operating system, application servers and databases. I've heard that Splunk is a good tool but its quite hard to learn.

Are there any valuable alternatives? What are you using and why?

+2 votes

I am running MySQL 5.5.31 on FreeBSD 9.2. I have a web server with a miss-configured service that generates faulty connections. After a while, MySQl blocks any connection from the web server.

At some stage, I had set-up a script that would browse syslog log and look for a string like "Host 'xxx' is blocked because of many connection errors; unblock with 'mysqladmin flush-hosts'" and would then issue a mysqladmin flush-hosts.

But after an upgrade, MySQl stopped reporting to syslog. Any help will be greatly appreciated.

+1 vote

What kind of secret voodoo does one need to use rsyslog on a systemd system? Is it even possible?

I have installed it, and I only get kernel boot messages in /var/log/messages.

I find journalctl to be fundamentally braindead, lacking features which we have taken for granted for decades in redhat/rhel/fedora/centos. (Seriously, whats the wisdom of keeping ALL logs around forever?, and in an easily corruptible format).

I found something on the fedora web site which said to just install rsyslog. Which seems to be obsolete or invalid.

0 votes

I am torn between deploying Microsoft Exchange 2016 and Linux-based SMTP servers like sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim. Relative ease of installation and configuration is an important consideration factor.

Microsoft Exchange 2016, Domain Controller, and Active Directory are relatively easy to install and configure. Linux-based SMTP servers are extremely difficult to install and configure and of course, extremely time-consuming.

One of the features of Microsoft Exchange 2016 is that you can create additional folders on your Inbox in the server (server-side). Can Linux-based SMTP servers do that?

Does Exchange 2016 offer more user-friendly features or Linux-based SMTP servers?

Besides the above considerations, how about security? Traditionally, Linux is far more secure than Windows. Judging by security, Linux-based SMTP servers ought to have a higher percentage of the market share?

Finally, I can only use Windows Server 2016 Standard Evaluation Copy FREE for a period of 3 years MAXIMUM. But I can use Linux servers and Mail Transport Agents (MTA) FREE perpetually.

Please share your opinion?

+1 vote

I know the basics of pthread but looking for more information on uses of pthread_detach library function.

Contact Us
+91 9880187415
sales@queryhome.net
support@queryhome.net
#280, 3rd floor, 5th Main
6th Sector, HSR Layout
Bangalore-560102
Karnataka INDIA.
QUERY HOME
...