top button
Flag Notify
    Connect to us
      Site Registration

Site Registration

Can we decrease MCS instead of MAC padding?

0 votes
347 views
Can we decrease MCS instead of MAC padding?
posted Mar 18, 2020 by Poonam
Share this question
Facebook Share Button Twitter Share Button LinkedIn Share Button

1 Answer

0 votes

Hi poonam,

Decreasing MCS might help in robustness in decoding but it decrease the Cell throughput. If you observe more MAC padding then you can decrease the no of RB. Mac Padding can happen within the last RB, That cannot be avoidable.

answer Mar 19, 2020 by Jaganathan

Your answer

Preview
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.
Similar Questions
0 votes
Can Scell send CA activation MAC CE instead of Pcell?

As i know, Pcell sends an MAC CE to activate the Scell, What if Scell sends deactivation MAC CE? Is this possible?

+1 vote
Can we have different MCS scheme per PRB instead of Group of PRBs in case of sub band CQI report?

Since eNodeB can have information about channel quality with finer granularity through selected
subband CQI, wouldn’t it make sense to have MCSs defined on a per‐RB (or a group of RB) basis rather
than a single MCS per UE across all allocated RBs for a codeword?

...